BD Nexiva™ Diffusics™ Closed IV Catheter System

 

The BD Nexiva™ Diffusics™ System:

Performance under Pressure

Providing quality patient care efficiently and minimizing the risk of complications are always top of mind whenever you use an IV catheter, but power injection protocols can pose particular challenges.

That's why the BD Nexiva™ Diffusics™ Closed IV Catheter System is designed to address common CT IV challenges during power injection procedures.

  • Reduces the destabilizing effects that can lead to extravasation
    • Catheter tip features multiple teardrop-shaped diffusion holes to reduce forces that cause catheter motion in the vein by up to 67%*
  • Enable high flow rates with patients that may require a smaller IV catheter
    • Enables higher flow rates with a smaller gauge catheter (22 G - 24 G),* facilitating difficult venous access situations
  • All-in-one catheter and extension set built for your power injector's 325 psi setting
  • BD Instaflash™ Needle Technology confirms immediate vessel entry, designed to help improve first-stick success
  • BD Vialon™ Biomaterial enables longer dwell times,1† supporting the current Nursing Standards of Practice for clinically indicated site rotation.2

Clinical Evidence

IV Contrast Administration with Dual Source 128-MDCT: A Randomized Controlled Study Comparing 18-gauge Nonfenestrated and 20-gauge Fenestrated Catheters for Catheter Placement Success, Infusion Rate, Image Quality and Complications
Johnson PT, Christensen GM, Fishman EK. IV contrast administration with dual source 128-MDCT: a randomized controlled study comparing 18-gauge nonfenestrated and 20-gauge fenestrated catheters for catheter placement success, infusion rate, image quality and complications. Am J Roentgenol. 2014;202(6):1166-70.
Link to abstract >

Indwell Times, Complications and Costs of Open vs Closed Safety Peripheral Intravenous Catheters: A Randomized Study
González López J, Arribi Vilela A, Fernández Del Palacio E, Olivares Corral J, Benedicto Martí C, Herrera Portal P. Indwell times, complications and costs of open vs closed safety peripheral intravenous catheters: a randomized study. J Hosp Infect. 2014;86(2):117-126.
Link to abstract >

A Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare the Complications of 2 Peripheral Intravenous Catheter-Stabilization Systems
Bausone-Gazda D, Lefaiver C, Walters S. A randomized controlled trial to compare the complications of 2 peripheral intravenous catheter-stabilization systems. J Infus Nurs. 2010;33(6):371-384.
Link to abstract >

Product Info

Product Brochure
Product Specification Sheet
In-service Wall Chart
What is BD Diffusics
Instructions for Use
Product FAQs

Videos

Techniques for Use
Product Animation
Catheter Motion — Standard IV Catheter
Extravasation — Standard IV Catheter
Product in Use

Product White Papers

Catheter Motion Study
Diffuser Efficiency Study
In-vivo Fluoroscopy Study



*    Compared to a non-diffusion tip IV catheter.
Compared to an FEP catheter.
1. Maki DG, Ringer M. Risk factors for infusion-related phlebitis with small peripheral venous catheters. Ann Intern Med. 1991;114:845-854.
2. Infusion Nurses Society. Infusion Nursing Standards of Practice. J Infus Nurs. 2011;34(1S):S57.


BD-0706 (12/15)

© 2016 BD. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise noted, BD, the BD Logo and all other trademarks are property of Becton, Dickinson and Company.