5 Cervical Sampling Related Articles
5.1 Peer-reviewed Cervical Sampling publications
5.2 Non- peer reviewed publication(s)
5.1 Peer-reviewed Cervical Sampling publications
Day SJ, O'Shaughnessy DL, O'Connor JC, Freund GG.
Additional collection devices used in conjunction with the SurePath® Liquid-Based Pap Test broom device do not enhance diagnostic utility.
BMC Womens Health. 2004 Sep 13;4(1):6.
Tibbs RF, Wong JY, Logrono R.
Enhancing recovery of endocervical component on gynecologic cytology specimens processed by thin-layer technology.
Acta Cytologica 2003; 47(2):172-6.
Roberson J, Connolly K, St John K, Eltoum I, Chhieng DC.
Accuracy of reporting endocervical component adequacy--a continuous quality improvement project.
Diagn Cytopathol. 2002 Sep;27(3):181-4.
Risbert B, Andersson A, Zetterberg C, Nordin B.
Cervex-Brush vs Spatula and Cytobrush. A Cytohistologic Evaluation.
Journal Reproductive Medicine 1997 Jul;42(7):405-8
Jarvi K.
Cervex-Brush versus Vaginal-Cervical-Endocervical (VCE) triple Smear Techniques in Cervical Sampling.
Cytopathology 1997 Aug;8(4):282-8
Risberg B, Andersson A, Zetterberg C, Nordin B.
Cervex-Brush vs. spatula and Cytobrush. A cytohistologic evaluation.
J Reprod Med. 1997 Jul;42(7):405-8.
Sparrow MJ, Fauck R, Gupta RK.
A trial of two methods of taking cervical smears: the Aylesbury spatula plus cytology brush compared to the Cervex broom.
N Z Med J. 1997 Sep 26;110(1052):356-8.
Buntinx F. Brouwers M.
Relation Between Sampling Device and Detection of Abnormality in Cervical Smears:a Meta-Analysis of Randomised and Quasi-Randomised Studies.
BMJ 1996 Nov 23;313(7068):1285-90
Kavak ZN, Eren F, Pekin S, Kullu S.
A randomized Comparison of the 3 Papanicolaou Smear Collection Methods.
Australian N Z Journal Obstetrics Gynaecology 1995 Nov;35(4):446-9
Paraiso MF, Brady K, Helmchen R, Roat TW.
Evaluation of the Endocervical Cytobrush and Cervex-Brush in Pregnant Women.
Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1994 Oct;84(4):539-43
Cannon JM, Blythe JG.
Comparison of the Cytobrush Plus Plastic Spatula with the Cervex-Brush for Obtaining Endocervical Cells.
Obstetrics & Gynecology 1993 Oct;82(4 PT 1):569-72
McCord ML, Stovall TG, Summitt RL., Coleman SA.
Cervical Cytology:a Randomized Comparison of Four Sampling Methods.
American Journal Obstetrics & Gynecology. 1992 Jun;166 (6 Pt 1):1772-7
Ferris DG, Berrey MM, Ellis KE, Petry LJ, Boxnaes J, Beatie RT.
The Optimal Technique for Obtaining a Papanicolaou Smear with the Cervex-Brush.
Journal Family Practice. 1992 Mar 34(3):276-80
Hutchinson M, Fertitta L, Goldbaum B, Hamza M, Vanerian S.
Cervex-Brush and Cytobrush. Comparison of Their Ability to Sample Abnormal Cells for Cervical Smears.
Journal Reproductive Medicine. 1991 Aug; 36 (8):581-6
Boon ME, de Graaff Guilloud JC, Rietveld WJ.
Analysis of Five Sampling Methods for the Preparation of Cervical Smears.
Acta Cytologica 1989 Nov-Dec; 33(6): 843-848
Back to top
5.2 Non- peer reviewed publication(s)
Bonfiglio TA, Erozan YS.
Gynecologic Cytopathology.
Book chapter. Atkison KM. Specimen Collection and Determinants of Adequacy. Lippencott-Raven. 1997.
